-
June 30th, 2009Uncategorized
A week ago today, the last issue of the Rocky Mountain News hit newsstands across Denver. The paper’s owner, E.W. Scripps Company, closed the Pulitzer Prize-winning paper to the shock of the paper’s staff and readers. Other papers could soon face the same demise. We speak to Newspaper Guild president Bernie Lunzer and Laura Frank, until last week an investigative reporter at the Rocky Mountain News.
-
June 29th, 2009UncategorizedGenerally, businesses and trusts and estates in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County, California need a new employer identification number (“EIN”) when their ownership or structure has changed. Changing the name of your business does not require you to obtain a new EIN.
What follows are some general rules about when getting a new federal EIN may or may not be appropriate:
Trusts
You will be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• One person is the grantor/maker of many trusts.
• A trust changes to an estate.
• A living or intervivos trust changes to a testamentary trust.
• A living trust terminates by distributing its property to a residual trust.You will not be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• The trustee changes.
• The grantor or beneficiary changes his/her name or addressEstates
You will be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• A trust is created with funds from the estate (not simply a continuation of the estate).
• You represent an estate that operates a business after the owner's death.You will not be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statement is true.
• The administrator, personal representative, or executor changes his/her name or address.Limited Liability Company (LLC)
An LLC is a new entity created by state statute. The IRS did not create a new tax classification for the LLC when it was created by the states; instead IRS uses the tax entity classifications it has always had for business taxpayers: corporation, partnership, or sole proprietor. An LLC is always classified by the IRS as one of these types of taxable entities.Corporations
You will be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• A corporation receives a new charter from the secretary of state.
• You are a subsidiary of a corporation using the parent's EIN or you become a subsidiary of a corporation.
• You change to a partnership or a sole proprietorship.
• A new corporation is created after a statutory merger.You will not be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• You are a division of a corporation.
• The surviving corporation uses the existing EIN after a corporate merger.
• A corporation declares bankruptcy.
• The corporate name or location changes.
• A corporation chooses to be taxed as an S corporation.
• Reorganization of a corporation changes only the identity or place.Sole Proprietors
You will be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• You are subject to a bankruptcy proceeding.
• You incorporate.
• You take in partners and operate as a partnership.
• You purchase or inherit an existing business that you operate as a sole proprietorship.You will not be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• You change the name of your business.
• You change your location and/or add other locations.
• You operate multiple businesses.Partnerships
You will be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• You incorporate.
• Your partnership is taken over by one of the partners and is operated as a sole proprietorship.
• You end an old partnership and begin a new one.You will not be required to obtain a new EIN if any of the following statements are true.
• The partnership declares bankruptcy.
• The partnership name changes.
• You change the location of the partnership or add other locations.
• A new partnership is formed as a result of the termination of a partnership under IRC section 708(b)(1)(B).
• 50 percent or more of the ownership of the partnership (measured by interests in capital and profits) changes hands within a twelve-month period (terminated partnerships under Reg. 301.6109-1). -
June 28th, 2009Uncategorized
President Obama hosted a White House summit Thursday on reforming healthcare. While President Obama said every idea must be considered, the idea of creating a single-payer national health insurance program appears to have already been rejected. We speak to Harper’s senior editor Luke Mitchell, author of the article “Sick in the Head: Why America Won’t Get the Health-Care System It Needs.”
-
June 27th, 2009UncategorizedSenator Carolyn McGinn of Kansas (pictured) recently published an op-ed calling for an end to the death penalty because it is too costly and does not benefit the people. Sen. McGinn, a Republican from Sedgwick, is the sponsor of a bill that would replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without parole. She explained that in light of the state’s budget deficit, Kansas is looking at ways to reduce government spending. “One policy change being considered is whether the death penalty is worth its higher cost to Kansas citizens, versus the alternative sentence of life in prison without parole we now have on the books,” she wrote. She pointed to a Kansas legislative report that found "the estimated median cost of a case in which the death sentence was given was about 70% more than the median cost of a non-death penalty murder case.
-
June 26th, 2009Uncategorized
As many as 143 soldiers took their own lives last year, the highest rate of suicides among US troops ever. We speak with Salon.com correspondent Mark Benjamin, co-author of an in-depth investigation of suicides at an army base in Colorado.
-
June 25th, 2009UncategorizedQueensland Police have warned the public they will take swift action against anyone who tries to interfere with serial pedophile Dennis Ferguson.
Ferguson, 61, was yesterday acquitted of one count of indecent treatment of a child under 12 years in the Brisbane District Court.
The charge stemmed from allegations he inappropriately touched a five-year-old girl during a visit to her home at Dalby, west of Brisbane, on November 9, 2005.
Deputy Commissioner Kathy Rynders said Mr Ferguson, who has previously served sentences for child sex offences, now deserved to live as a free man.
"I would appeal to everyone to take a rational, mature approach to this development," she said.
"Threatening the safety of any person is an offence and anyone taking this course of action risks being arrested and prosecuted.
"If Mr Ferguson's safety is threatened by the actions of others, the QPS will act to ensure public order."
"The QPS will not hesitate to step in to protect public order, and the last thing we want is to have people committing criminal offences and ending up facing the courts themselves."
Ms Rynders said Mr Ferguson has been quietly and lawfully living in the community since his arraignment, and there was no reason to expect that to change.
"We will be actively monitoring Mr Ferguson on a daily basis for a period of time, to ensure he is behaving in a lawful manner, just as we have done in the months since he was arraigned for trial.
"Additionally, the Child Protection Act allows police to quickly react to any actions taken by Mr Ferguson or any other convicted sex offender.
"This, however, will be the extent of QPS involvement at this time. We will have no role in providing Mr Ferguson with accommodation."
Ms Rydners said the Ferguson case was a timely reminder that the best protection for children was diligence and common sense and that the vast majority of offences against children are committed by family members, friends and people known to the victims.
"Every family should, from an early age, teach their children how to stay safe and what to do if they feel uncomfortable with any person or in any situation," Ms Rynders said. -
June 24th, 2009UncategorizedU.S. v. Tharps, 2009 WL 975532 (4/13/09) (unpub'd) - The 10th affirms denial of acceptance of responsibility reduction where the defendant was convicted of only the offenses he admitted to on the stand: possession of cocaine for personal use and felon-in-possession, and was acquitted of possession with intent to distribute and possessing a gun in furtherance thereof. First, the defendant did not admit to being a felon-in-possession prior to trial. Second, he required the government to prove its case before he testified [the government had to prove he was a felon, etc.]. -
June 24th, 2009Uncategorized
Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, has announced his resignation as the company’s CEO. The move comes weeks after the company changed its name to Xe in an attempt to rebrand the firm. Jeremy Scahill, author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, assesses the latest developments.
-
June 23rd, 2009UncategorizedIn U.S. v. Aldrich, No. 08-15556 (April 27, 2009), the Court held that the "sexual contact" sentence enhancement of USSG § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) includes the act of masturbating on the internet. The Court explained that the guideline definition of "contact" refers to contact with "any person" – which includes the defendant. -
June 23rd, 2009Uncategorized
President Obama’s plan to withdraw US combat troops from Iraq has both been hailed by some as a signal of the coming end of the war while criticized by others as an extension of the occupation. We host a debate between Lawrence Korb, the former assistant secretary of defense under President Reagan, and Jeremy Scahill, award-winning author and investigative journalist.
